Hello:Based on the limited facts you provided in the original comment, I tried to avoid the question of whether you actually have a 6 month term with your tenant. Honestly, I don`t think you do, and this whole „implicit“ idea is just an argument. Although I have no idea what your tenant might say (they may even agree that they are over a 6-month period), I could imagine a situation where the tenant could say that they expected you to tell them to sign a lease for six months, but you seemed to forget about it. Therefore, they were quite willing and perhaps happy to continue with a lease on a monthly basis. If this story was in competition with your story (and I know there are counterpoints and more counterpoints, etc.), but if it came out that way, I expect you to lose. As an owner, control is your duty to define the terms of the contract. In the absence of a written lease and a clear agreement on the terms of the tenancy agreement, „doubts“ about the conditions in favour of the tenant will be resolved (in my opinion). It is akin to a counter-proferentum argument in contract law – although ambiguity here includes not only written documents, but oral and unspoken terms that make the RTA „valid.“ That said, they have an argument and maybe the tenant will agree or say something else that won`t help them, or maybe a judge will accept your theory. I`m not giving him a big chance. As for your last paragraph.
The tenant is never obliged or ordered to try to sublet or assign the tenancy agreement. The only thing a court, or even the BTA, would order is the reimbursement of criminal damages. Therefore, if the tenant is simply empty and does not omit anything or assigns anything, one would be obliged to re-rent the unit (i.e.. Reducing their losses – i.e. minimizing them]. If you have not succeeded, you can then sue the tenant for the rent you lost as a result of the breach of the tenancy agreement and the failure to comply with a formal termination. If I am right and you do not have a term of 6 months, the tenant is at one month`s rent. The tenant is required to give you 60 days until the end of the (monthly) term. Therefore, if the redundancy is made today, January 31, 2015 is —previsible that the rent is paid the first month.
If the tenant does not give you a correct termination (form N9) and simply moves on the basis of an email, it is my experience that the court will translate this non-communication into a period that the tenant could have legitimately given on that date. This corresponds to the content of the RTA. This period is 60 days – subject to your obligation to minimize losses and re-rent them. Therefore, if you rent again before 60 days, you will only receive this portion of the unpaid period (plus perhaps mitigation fees such as advertising). If you are unable to prove that you have taken appropriate mitigation measures, you could actually get zero. If you take action against the tenant, I would be happy to hear you say how the court ruled. Michael K. E. Thielewww.ottawalawyers.com I am a student, and last year was my first year as a tenant. (And our landlord knew it for good and took advantage of it, for example.B.
calculated an illegal security deposit until we started researching the law and fighting back). Anyway, I said on my taxes that I paid the rent in 2013. In September, I received a letter from the Canada Revenue Agency saying that they regularly conduct audit programs as an important part of the self-assessment system, and they ask that I file receipts to support my right to rent paid in Ontario in 2013. As I live from home, I have not yet received this letter.) My landlord gave me a receipt at the end of my rent. However, my last name is misspelled if he wrote the amount he wrote „fifteee“ and then scribbled a „n“ on the third „e“ (without starting it as permission for this change, he should initiate this error?), the address is only the number of the house and l